Footwear QC · measured, not marketed
How good are our shoe renders, really?
Every figure below is measured on a real benchmark run of shoe input/output pairs and shown with its methodology — sample size, library, pipeline version, and the date it was measured. No figure can appear without them. We report the hard presets honestly: a recolor's colour drift and a try-on's stance drift sit right next to the easy wins.
The pipeline that produced these numbers
-
1
Input shoe image
A real product or on-model shoe photo.
-
2
oaktree/image-edit
Single Oaktree edit pass. No -pro variant.
-
3
Output render
The generated shoe image.
-
4
QC measurement
colour-science + MediaPipe + pixel-spec.
Model
oaktree/image-edit
Cost / image
$0.04
Inputs → outputs
24 → 24
Total run cost
$0.96
measured 2026-06-02 · pipeline v1.0
Objective metrics
computedEach figure is computed by a named library against a stated threshold. Hard presets first — their lower numbers are the point, not a thing to hide.
Catalog Variant Generator (Recolor)
oaktree/image-edit · $0.04/image
Hardest preset for colour: a recolor must hit a target hue while holding material, stitching and specular highlights. ΔE is the metric that bites here — we report it honestly.
Color fidelity (ΔE 2000)
target ≤ 10 ΔE to target
Background compliance
target ≥ 95% PDP pass
Auto-QC first-pass rate
target ≥ 85% first pass
Virtual Try-On (Footwear)
oaktree/image-edit · $0.04/image
On-model shoe try-on is hard: the render must keep the model's identity and foot stance while swapping the shoe. Identity and pose drift are the honest pressure points.
Face preservation
target ≥ 0.99 landmark cosine
Pose / stance preservation
target ≤ 0.15 stance drift (torso-norm)
Color fidelity (ΔE 2000)
target ≤ 2.0 ΔE (imperceptible)
Auto-QC first-pass rate
target ≥ 85% first pass
White-Background Standardizer
oaktree/image-edit · $0.04/image
The easiest of the three and our highest pass rate — included as an honest contrast so the harder presets read in context, not as a wall of identical 99%s.
Background compliance
target ≥ 95% PDP pass
Color fidelity (ΔE 2000)
target ≤ 2.0 ΔE (imperceptible)
Auto-QC first-pass rate
target ≥ 85% first pass
Per-render certificates
Every render carries its own QC certificate with a shareable link — its actual ΔE, white-bg compliance, identity and stance numbers, not an average.
White-Background Standardizer
View QC certificate →
White-Background Standardizer
View QC certificate →
White-Background Standardizer
View QC certificate →
White-Background Standardizer
View QC certificate →
White-Background Standardizer
View QC certificate →
White-Background Standardizer
View QC certificate →
White-Background Standardizer
View QC certificate →
White-Background Standardizer
View QC certificate →
White-Background Standardizer
View QC certificate →
White-Background Standardizer
View QC certificate →
Catalog Variant Generator (Recolor)
View QC certificate →
Catalog Variant Generator (Recolor)
View QC certificate →
Catalog Variant Generator (Recolor)
View QC certificate →
Catalog Variant Generator (Recolor)
View QC certificate →
Catalog Variant Generator (Recolor)
View QC certificate →
Catalog Variant Generator (Recolor)
View QC certificate →
Catalog Variant Generator (Recolor)
View QC certificate →
Catalog Variant Generator (Recolor)
View QC certificate →
Virtual Try-On (Footwear)
View QC certificate →
Virtual Try-On (Footwear)
View QC certificate →
Virtual Try-On (Footwear)
View QC certificate →
Virtual Try-On (Footwear)
View QC certificate →
Virtual Try-On (Footwear)
View QC certificate →
Virtual Try-On (Footwear)
View QC certificate →
Subjective notes
not a metricThese are human impressions from reviewing the set — deliberately kept out of the numbers above. "Looks good" is not a measurement. Recolors read clean on matte materials and get harder on glossy patent finishes; on-model try-ons are most convincing in neutral standing poses. Treat this as context, not as a score.